Would a couple's romance be everlasting?

We certainly hope it does..

But well, will the flame of love be burning eternally?
Amongst the occasional stormy winds, can the flame( of love) weather through and still be burning brightly?
Or will it be flickering as though a candle in the wind?


Think about it.
For a minute.


Now picture yourself with the other half, or significant other doing things together. Be it enjoying a romantic movie in the own comfort of your own apartment; Having a hot and wild night out at a local club together; Belting lovey-dopey hits at the karoke bar till you sound like a pair of horny toads; Or just soaking and hugging each other in the private tub.

I think all or should i say most of us do long for that 'special one' to be with us all the time(if possible), or at least when we need a hug, or shoulder to cry on, or someone to confide in. Even the happy moments we would love to share them with the significant other.

Perhaps that is why this phrase exists in the wedding vow - 'In sickness or health, for richer or poorer'.
I'm just making an assumption lah.. It does not mean it really originated from there.

Showing concern for our other half is a must, if i should say but is there a limit to it? Is it possible that we may suffocate our lovers with too much concern that it becomes more of a strangle, where they feel that their movements, whereabouts are being eagle-watched? I would not like it certainly and for sure would not want my significant other to feel the same way too.

Love is not a prison. You do not make the other half feel as though they are bound with a metal ball to their ankle. Unless they want it, then that is another argument totally.